77-426 MOS Word 2013 Expert Part 2 Exam Guide
Exam 77-426, MOS Word 2013 Expert Part 2, validates advanced ability to manage complex Word documents rather than simply apply everyday formatting. It serves candidates pursuing the Word 2013 Expert credential, workplace users who build controlled document sets, and students or professionals following a Microsoft Office Specialist pathway. This guide helps you decide whether your current practice should focus on document management, references, change control, accessibility, or integrated project work before you schedule through the appropriate provider.
What does 77-426 validate?
77-426 validates performance with advanced Word 2013 document tasks, including managing document sets, controlling revisions, building references, organizing large documents, and preparing content for internationalization and accessibility. Certiport describes MOS 2013 testing as project-based and intended to assess real-world Microsoft Office exercises, so preparation should emphasize completing coherent workflows instead of memorizing isolated commands.
The official title is “MOS Word 2013 Expert Part 2.” Its skills outline identifies “Manage and Share Documents” as an objective domain and expands that domain into several practical capabilities. The outline does not present this exam as a general introduction to Word; it assumes that the candidate can already work comfortably with the application and now needs to control more complicated documents and publishing processes.
The exam belongs to the Word 2013 Expert pathway. Certiport states that earning Microsoft Office Word 2013 Expert requires passing both Word 2013 Expert Part One and Word 2013 Expert Part Two. Therefore, passing 77-426 alone should not be described as the complete Word 2013 Expert certification. Check your certification record and the current Certiport information before planning the second required exam or a broader MOS track.
Who should take this exam?
This exam suits candidates who regularly work with long, shared, reference-heavy, or highly controlled Word documents and want an advanced MOS credential. It is a stronger fit for people who can already create and edit ordinary Word documents without step-by-step help, then need to demonstrate reliable handling of templates, revisions, indexes, reference tables, master documents, and accessibility settings.
A candidate may be preparing for an academic or workforce credential, following a MOS 2013 Expert route, or documenting advanced Word capability for an employer. Certiport positions MOS 2013 testing for students and professionals and describes the assessment as a way to appraise real-world Office skills. The practical audience is therefore broader than a single job title, but the required behavior is specific: produce correct document outcomes through Word’s features.
Do not choose this exam solely because you know basic formatting, tables, styles, or page layout. Those skills are useful foundations, but the supplied 77-426 outline concentrates on document control and advanced document structures. If you have not yet built a document with references that update correctly, reconciled tracked revisions, or managed related files without breaking their relationships, start with skills practice before selecting an appointment.
Which skills are measured?
The 77-426 outline is the best study boundary: use it as a checklist, then practice each objective in a working Word 2013 file. The supplied evidence identifies six connected areas—multiple-document management, change management, advanced ordering and grouping, indexes, reference tables, and internationalization and accessibility. The exam-specific document does not supply blueprint percentages in the research snapshot, so no percentage allocation should be assumed.
The skills are interdependent. A document can contain a table of contents, captions, footnotes, citations, and an index, but those features depend on consistent structure and correctly marked content. Likewise, a master document or merged document set can become unreliable if styles, versions, templates, or linked elements are handled casually. Practice the relationship between features rather than treating every objective as a separate menu exercise.
Manage multiple documents and shared assets
The outline includes modifying templates, merging documents, managing versions, copying styles, copying macros, linking to external data, and moving building blocks. Practice these as controlled transfer tasks: begin with a source document and a destination document, identify what should move, perform the transfer, and inspect the result for style changes, broken links, missing components, or unintended formatting.
A useful exercise is to create a small document set with a template, reusable building blocks, custom styles, and related content. Make a controlled revision, save a distinct version, and then merge or transfer the relevant components into another file. The point is not to create a visually elaborate sample. It is to learn what changes when an asset is copied, linked, merged, or moved.
Manage document changes and review outcomes
The exam covers tracking changes, managing comments, configuring markup options, resolving multi-document style conflicts, and displaying all changes. Practice both sides of the workflow: make edits as a contributor, then review them as the document owner. Learn to distinguish visible markup from the underlying document state and verify what is accepted, rejected, retained, or removed.
A common mistake is to change the display settings and assume that the document itself has been finalized. Displaying or hiding markup does not by itself resolve revisions. Build a review routine that includes checking tracked changes, inspecting comments, configuring the view, resolving conflicts after combining content, and confirming the final appearance after review information is handled.
Build outlines, master documents, and subdocuments
The outline covers creating outlines, promoting outline sections, creating master documents, inserting subdocuments, and linking document elements. These tasks require structural thinking: headings must represent the intended hierarchy, and the relationships among the master document, subdocuments, and linked elements must remain understandable after changes.
Practice by dividing a long report into logical sections and assigning a clear heading hierarchy before inserting the sections into a master document. Promote and demote outline sections deliberately, then inspect navigation, numbering, and references. Avoid starting with arbitrary formatting; structure should come first because later reference features depend on a stable document organization.
Create indexes and reference tables
The exam includes marking index entries, updating indexes, and using index auto-mark files. It also covers tables of contents, tables of figures, tables of authorities, captions, footnotes, and citations. Practice creating the source markings first, generating the reference feature second, and updating it after content changes so you can see which parts are fields or generated results rather than manually typed text.
For a realistic exercise, use a short technical report with headings, figures, legal or policy references where appropriate, footnotes, and terms that deserve an index. Add or revise content after generating the tables and index, then update the results. This exposes a frequent weakness: a candidate may know how to insert a feature but not how to maintain it when the document changes.
Do not manually type a table of contents or index as a substitute for learning the feature. A manually imitated result may look correct in a static file but will not demonstrate that you can mark entries, update generated content, or maintain references. Verify both the visible output and the underlying marks or fields used to produce it.
Prepare documents for internationalization and accessibility
The outline explicitly includes language options, alt text, accessibility tools, theme fonts, global content standards, and tab order. Treat this as a document-quality requirement, not a final cosmetic check. Practice preparing content so that language, visual elements, navigation, and document conventions remain usable when the document is shared with different audiences or assistive technologies.
Use images or other visual objects in a practice file and add meaningful alt text. Review language settings, inspect theme fonts, and use accessibility tools where available. Then test the document’s logical order and navigation. For tab order, focus on the sequence a user would encounter rather than merely whether every object is present on the page.
A frequent pitfall is confusing decorative description with useful alternative text. Another is applying a font or layout change that looks acceptable locally but conflicts with a global content standard. Record the reason for each setting in your practice notes; this helps you reproduce the action and understand its effect when the task wording changes.
How should you prepare for a performance-based project?
Prepare by reproducing complete document outcomes under controlled conditions. Certiport says MOS Word 2013 candidates are presented with a project to complete, rather than only a series of disconnected required tasks. Your practice should therefore include source files, instructions, intermediate decisions, and a final inspection. Speed matters, but reliable recovery from an unexpected document state matters just as much.
Start each exercise by translating the requested result into a short action plan. Identify the documents involved, the structural features required, the references that must update, and any review or accessibility checks. Save a clean starting copy before experimenting. At the end, inspect the output against the requested result instead of assuming that a completed command means a completed requirement.
Use the Word 2013 environment when possible. The exam is specifically associated with Word 2013, and a newer version may place controls elsewhere or behave differently in areas such as document management, references, or review. If your available version differs, use it to understand concepts but verify the exact workflow in the target environment before relying on it.
What study sequence is most efficient?
Study in dependency order: establish document structure, manage related files, control changes, add references, and finish with internationalization and accessibility checks. This sequence mirrors how a complex document is usually built and makes errors easier to diagnose. It also prevents you from spending most of your time on visually obvious features while neglecting the document relationships that support them.
A practical sequence is:
1. Baseline assessment: attempt one integrated Word project without notes. Record every point at which you need a search, tutorial, or repeated attempt. Do not use leaked content or exam dumps; they cannot replace legitimate skill practice and do not guarantee a pass.
2. Document control: practice templates, versions, styles, macros, external data links, building blocks, and merging. Keep a written record of what is copied versus linked and what must be updated after transfer.
3. Structure: practice outlines, heading hierarchy, master documents, subdocuments, and linked elements. Rebuild the same structure from a clean file so that success does not depend on an accidental prior configuration.
4. Review: introduce tracked changes and comments, alter markup settings, combine content with style conflicts, and complete a deliberate review and finalization cycle.
5. References: add captions, tables of contents, tables of figures, tables of authorities, footnotes, citations, and index entries. Change the source document and update the generated results.
6. Accessibility and internationalization: review language options, alt text, accessibility tools, theme fonts, global content standards, and tab order after the document is otherwise complete.
7. Integrated rehearsal: combine at least several domains in one project. Use a timer only after you can complete the workflow accurately, because early speed practice can reinforce shortcuts and omissions.
How can you turn the skills outline into daily practice?
Give each practice session one observable outcome and one verification step. For example, do not write “study indexes”; instead, mark index entries, generate the index, add a new term, update it, and confirm that the new term appears. This approach turns the official objective list into evidence of capability and shows which parts of a workflow still need attention.
Use a three-column log: objective, action performed, and verification result. Under “Manage and Share Documents,” list the individual tasks from the outline and note whether you can complete them in a clean file. Under review, note whether you can configure markup and then explain the final document state. Under references, record whether updates remain correct after edits.
Microsoft’s exam-preparation guidance says MOS exam detail pages include a downloadable Skills measured outline. Use the official 77-426 outline as the authority for scope, and use Microsoft Learn preparation resources for general preparation support where applicable. Microsoft also identifies self-paced modules, instructor-led training, exam-preparation videos for some exams, and Practice Assessments for some exams; availability is not guaranteed for this specific legacy exam, so check the current pages rather than assuming every resource exists.
What mistakes commonly waste preparation time?
The most damaging mistakes are practicing appearance without structure, completing actions without verifying outcomes, and relying on memorized sequences that fail when the starting document changes. Correct these by using clean files, checking generated results after edits, and explaining why each feature is used. A candidate who can recover from a changed document is better prepared than one who only repeats a familiar demonstration.
Avoid these traps:
• Treating the objective list as a collection of unrelated commands. Combine document management, review, structure, references, and accessibility in integrated exercises.
• Typing generated references manually. Learn marking and updating so the result responds to content changes.
• Hiding tracked changes instead of resolving them. Confirm the document’s actual review state.
• Copying styles or macros without inspecting the destination. Check for conflicts and unintended changes.
• Building a master document from poorly structured sections. Establish headings and relationships before assembling the set.
• Leaving accessibility until the final minute. Add alt text and review language, fonts, tools, and order while the document is still easy to correct.
• Using exam dumps, leaked questions, or claims of guaranteed success. These do not establish the practical skills the performance-based assessment is intended to measure and may leave important objectives unpracticed.
How do you know when you are ready?
You are closer to readiness when you can complete a mixed Word 2013 project from a clean starting point, explain the document state after each major action, and repair ordinary errors without abandoning the workflow. Readiness is not demonstrated by recognizing menu names. It is demonstrated by producing the requested document and verifying its structure, references, revisions, and accessibility-related settings.
Use this readiness check:
• Can you manage a group of related documents and explain which elements are copied, linked, merged, or moved?
• Can you track and review changes, manage comments, configure markup, and resolve style conflicts after combining content?
• Can you create an outline, promote sections, and work with a master document and subdocuments?
• Can you mark and update an index, table of contents, table of figures, or other reference table after editing the source content?
• Can you use captions, footnotes, citations, and tables of authorities where the document requires them?
• Can you review language options, alt text, accessibility tools, theme fonts, global standards, and tab order?
• Can you perform these actions in the Word 2013 interface you will use, without depending on a prepared file?
If one answer is no, make that item the focus of the next practice cycle. If several answers are no, postpone scheduling until you have completed targeted exercises and one integrated rehearsal.
How do you register and choose delivery arrangements?
For a Microsoft Office Specialist exam, Microsoft’s scheduling guidance directs candidates to select “Schedule with Certiport.” Begin from the relevant certification or exam information, choose the scheduling option, and follow the provider’s registration process. Confirm that 77-426 and the language or location you need are actually available before committing to a date, because the supplied sources do not establish current availability everywhere.
Microsoft states that students, members of academic institutions, and candidates taking a MOS exam should select Certiport, while other Microsoft certification candidates may use Pearson VUE. The same guidance says Certiport does not offer online proctored exams at this time. That is a delivery-policy statement from the cited source, not a promise about every local testing arrangement; verify the available option with the provider before planning travel or equipment.
The scheduling article says certification exams can be scheduled no more than 90 days in advance and explains that a candidate may be prompted to sign in to or create a Learn Profile. It also recommends using a personal Microsoft account for registration in the broader Microsoft certification process. Follow the current provider instructions and ensure that identity details match the required legal identification information before the appointment.
What should you confirm before booking?
Confirm the exam identity, provider, location, language, appointment rules, and any accommodation needs before booking. The 77-426 title is “MOS Word 2013 Expert Part 2,” and the official skills outline should be the document you use to confirm scope. Do not infer the current fee, appointment length, passing score, or retirement status from unrelated Microsoft exam pages.
Use this booking checklist:
• Verify that the provider lists 77-426 rather than a similarly named Word or Microsoft 365 exam.
• Confirm the testing language and whether the available appointment matches your needs. Microsoft’s preparation guidance notes that an exam may not be available in the same languages as a Practice Assessment.
• Ask Certiport or the testing center about current local delivery options, identification requirements, cancellation rules, and rescheduling rules.
• Request accommodations before scheduling if you use assistive devices, read-aloud support, require extra time, or need another approved adjustment. Microsoft advises making such requests early enough for the provider to review them.
• Check the appointment confirmation carefully and retain the provider’s instructions.
• If the exam is part of a larger MOS Expert or Master plan, verify which other exams are required and whether your records are attached to the correct account.
What is the practical roadmap from study to appointment?
A sensible roadmap has four stages: diagnose, build, integrate, and verify. Diagnose your gaps against the official outline. Build each skill in a clean Word 2013 file. Integrate several domains into a project. Verify scheduling and provider details only after your performance is consistent. This keeps administrative decisions aligned with actual readiness instead of using a booked date as a substitute for preparation.
During diagnosis, complete a representative document without tutorials and log the first failure in each domain. During the build stage, practice the smallest workflow that proves the objective—for example, update a reference after changing source content or reconcile a style conflict after combining files. During integration, create a long-form document set that includes structure, revisions, references, and accessibility checks.
During verification, repeat the integrated project from a clean starting point and remove notes gradually. Review the official outline again, confirm provider availability, and schedule through Certiport when ready. Keep a final study session for process review rather than learning a large new feature. Your next action should be concrete: download or open the 77-426 skills outline, mark your first weak domain, and create a practice file that tests it.
How does 77-426 fit into MOS 2013 pathways?
77-426 can serve as the second Word Expert examination and is listed by Certiport among exams used in MOS 2013 Master certification tracks. The exact credential outcome depends on the other required exams and the current program rules, so treat the pathway as an administrative plan to verify rather than an automatic result of passing one exam.
Certiport’s MOS 2013 overview describes a learn, practice, and certify pathway and states that candidates who achieve MOS 2013 exam certification earn a digital badge. These statements explain the program context, but they do not replace the current provider’s eligibility, scheduling, or credential-record instructions.
If your goal is specifically Word 2013 Expert, check that Word Expert Part One and Part Two are both accounted for. If your goal is MOS 2013 Master, consult the official Master requirements and confirm which exams apply to your planned track. Keep copies of appointment confirmations and results, especially when exams are taken through an academic institution or organization.
Conclusion
Treat 77-426 as a document-engineering assessment: the target is not a collection of remembered commands but a correctly managed Word 2013 project. Use the official skills outline to map practice, build from document structure and control, then add review, references, and accessibility checks. When you can complete and verify an integrated project from a clean file, confirm current Certiport details and schedule the exam through the appropriate channel. Avoid unsupported assumptions about score, price, timing, or availability; the provider’s current information should settle those decisions.
Related exams
- 77-725 exam — Microsoft Word 2016 Core: Document Creation, Collaboration and Communication (MOS)
- 77-727 exam — Excel 2016: Core Data Analysis, Manipulation, and Presentation
- 77-728 exam — Excel 2016 Expert: Interpreting Data for Insights
- 77-731 exam — Outlook 2016: Core Communication, Collaboration and Email Skills
- AZ-120 exam — Planning and Administering Microsoft Azure for SAP Workloads
- AZ-400 exam — Microsoft Azure DevOps Solutions
